top of page

Dexter Taylor's Fight: A Stark Reminder of Our Constant Battle for Liberty

In a New York courtroom, the case of Dexter Taylor has exposed a profoundly troubling instance of judicial abuse. Judge Abena Darkeh declared that the "2nd Amendment 'Doesn't Exist in This Courtroom,'" effectively stripping Taylor of his right to use it in his defense. This isn't just judicial overreach; it's a blatant assault on constitutional rights, setting a dangerous precedent that should alarm all who value liberty. This case starkly highlights the potential for judicial actions to undermine the very foundations of our legal system.



These are laws explicitly designed to prevent this kind of tyranny. Section 241 makes it illegal for two or more people to conspire to interfere with constitutional rights. Section 242 addresses the misconduct of those acting under the color of law who willfully strip away protected rights. What happened in Taylor's case? A clear-cut scenario where these laws should be front and center.



When a judge decides that a fundamental right, like the Second Amendment, doesn't apply in their courtroom, they're not just bending the law—they are breaking it. By declaring this, the judge denied Dexter Taylor his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and to present a complete defense. It's a textbook case for 18 U.S.C. § 242 violations—abuse of judicial power under the guise of legal authority.


Wider Constitutional Implications


This isn't just about the Second Amendment but the entire framework of our rights. If a judge can arbitrarily decide which constitutional rights apply, then we're not living in a republic anymore; we're living under the whims of rulers in robes. This raises enormous due process red flags under both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.


The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states, among other things, that no person shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This clause is typically invoked in federal cases and pertains to the fair and regular legal procedures that must be followed to ensure that individuals are not unjustly deprived of their legal rights.


In Taylor's case, the judge's unilateral declaration about the non-existence of the Second Amendment in the courtroom could be seen as a denial of due process. This is because it possibly denies Taylor the right to a fair hearing by precluding a legitimate defense based on constitutional rights, thus impairing his liberty to defend himself fully and fairly in a legal proceeding.


The Fourteenth Amendment extends this protection to the states through its own due process clause and also includes an equal protection clause. It stipulates that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This means that state officials, including judges in state courts, are required to operate under the same standards of due process as federal officials.


In addition, they must not apply the law unevenly to different people. In Taylor's case, if the judge's statement and its enforcement are considered within the context of denying him a specific constitutional defense available to others, it can be viewed as a violation of the equal protection clause by creating an unjust and discriminatory application of the law.



The 5th and 14th Amendment violations revolve around the fairness of legal proceedings and the right to use all applicable defenses. When Taylor was denied using a defense based on his constitutional rights (like the Second Amendment) without equal and fair application, it should be seen as a denial of due process and equal protection under the law. This unfairly limited his ability to contest charges in a manner inconsistent with the principles of justice and the protections guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.


This kind of judicial behavior is unacceptable and dangerous. It's time for those who value our freedoms to stand up and demand accountability. The Department of Justice needs to step in and investigate. 


This case should serve as a rallying cry for every activist, concerned citizen, and advocate for freedom. We must keep our eyes open and our voices loud. We cannot allow our rights to be trampled in any courtroom or by any judge. Let's make sure this case is not just a footnote in a legal textbook but a turning point in our ongoing fight for liberty.


HELP Dexter continue his fight by supporting him on his GiveSendGo Campaign. Thank You!




Doni Anthony (Doni The Misfit)


 

Introducing Doni Anthony (Doni The Misfit), Founder of Liberty Or Else and a passionate advocate for individual liberties and natural human rights. 


Join her engaging podcast, subscribe to her blog, and catch her inspiring speeches at public events. Support her work on Cash App or Venmo. Follow Doni on Facebook and Twitter for valuable insights and updates. #LibertyOrElse



If you believe in Liberty Or Else's mission and would like to help us continue our fight for liberty and spread our message, please consider making a voluntary monthly contribution.


Thank you.



Komentar


bottom of page